Active Votes
Archived Votes
Discussions
About Us

Your Ad Here

Over 49,623,000 Votes Cast!
VOTE.COM(tm)
Polls Have Closed
 
YES
It's irresponsible marketing
NO
Parents can decide what's good for their kids
 
the issue view results discussions
 
Why take a chance?


Cell phones emit low levels of radiofrequency radiation. A 1995 study showed that the smaller heads of five- and ten-year old children absorb more radiation from cell phones than adult-sized heads, and that the radiation penetrates further into the brain. Other studies show that heavy cell-phone users get more headaches and feel more fatigued than those who use them less. Sixteen studies sponsored by the cell-phone industry itself resulted in findings that need follow-up, a fact that cell phone manufacturers acknowledge to be true.

Given this state of uncertainty, scientists who have been studying cell phone radiation for years say that children should not use the phones. Why take the chance that years from now kids who used cell phones will develop tumors, or suffer other health effects? There are other, safe ways, like beepers, for parents to stay in touch with their children. Some manufacturers say they aren't really marketing the phones for use by children. Do they really expect us to believe that an adult will use a phone with a picture of Mickey Mouse on it? Because they refuse to admit the obvious, the Federal Communications Commission should either prohibit marketing of toy-like cell phones, or require that they carry a warning label.


 
 
more info
 
the facts
Cell phone radiation penetrates into children's brains

There is no evidence that cell phone radiation is harmful

the arguments
Where's the evidence?


 
back to the issue



©1999 VOTE.COM. All rights reserved. Patent Pending. Book sales in association with Amazon.com. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Read our Privacy Policy and view our Security Statement.