active votes
vote archive
discussions



VOTE.COM(tm)
Polls Have Closed
 
YES
Put victims on equal footing with defendants
NO
Enshrining victims' rights in the Constitution is unnecessary and dangerous
 
the issue view results discussions
 
Many legal scholars and victim activists are against an amendment


In court, it sometimes seems like nobody ever agrees.  But those uniting against the proposed Victims' Rights Amendment might ordinarily scowl at each other in a courtroom.  They include prosecutors and criminal defense attorneys, the ACLU, battered women, 450 law professors, and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

Quite simply, the amendment fails to answer many key questions. Will victims be entitled to lawyers and who will pay for them? How will victims enforce their rights? What happens when the defendant's and victim's rights clash, for example, when the defendant's entitlement to a fair trial butts against the victim's demand for speed?


 
 
more info
 
the facts
Anyone can be a victim, but criminals often have more rights

the arguments
Changing the Constitution may do more harm than good

Current law isn't doing enough to protect the needs of victims


 
back to the issue



©1999 VOTE.COM. All rights reserved. Patent Pending. Book sales in association with Amazon.com. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Read our Privacy Policy and view our Security Statement.