Active Votes
Archived Votes
Discussions
About Us



Over 49,623,000 Votes Cast!
VOTE.COM(tm)
Polls Have Closed
 
YES
They were right to acquit the four officers
NO
The officers should have been convicted
 
the issue view results discussions
 
Forty-one shots were fired at Diallo, who was unarmed


On February 25, 2000, four white New York City police officers were acquitted of murder and manslaughter charges, a year after they shot and killed West African immigrant Amadou Diallo in front of his home.  The officers fired forty-one shots at the unarmed Diallo, claiming they mistook his wallet for a gun.

Penalties for the charges of murder, manslaughter, criminally negligent homicide and reckless endangerment could have ranged from probation to life in prison.  Instead, the jury chose to let the four officers go free.  The group was made up of four black women, one white woman and seven white men.  They deliberated for more than twenty hours after a month-long trial.


 
 
more info
 
the facts
The four officers thought Diallo had a gun

the arguments
There should have been consequences for gunning down Diallo

Diallo's death was a tragedy, not a crime


 
back to the issue



©1999 VOTE.COM. All rights reserved. Patent Pending. Book sales in association with Amazon.com. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Read our Privacy Policy and view our Security Statement.