active votes
vote archive
discussions



VOTE.COM(tm)
Polls Have Closed
 
YES
Gay unions performed there should be valid throughout the country
NO
The impact of Vermont's decision should be restricted to that state
 
the issue view results discussions
 
Constitutional rights and human rights depend on nationwide recognition


Vermont is taking care of its gay and lesbian citizens in a way that other states are not.  Vermont is restating its commitment to fairness by today's action.
-David Smith of the Human Rights Campaign, as quoted by the Associated Press

On April 19, 2000, the Vermont state Senate gave final approval to a bill that will make it the first state to legally recognize relationships between gays and lesbians.  The measure - which is expected to be easily reconciled with a similar House measure before being signed by the state's governor - will not specifically permit gay marriage, but will allow gay couples to form "civil unions" that will entitle them to receive all the state's benefits of marriage.

State Senator James Leddy pointed out, "There's nothing in this court decision, nothing in this bill, nothing in the committed relationships of two people that presents a threat to my marriage." 

Leddy is right, and it won't hurt anyone else's marriage, either.  All it will do is give gay couples some of the rights they deserve.  In December 1999, Vermont's state Supreme Court ruled that same-sex couples were being unconstitutionally denied the benefits of marriage.  As state Senator Jean Ankeney said, "Here I am with the opportunity to vote to extend civil rights in our state.  It is for me a high honor and one I will always treasure." 

Though opponents of civil unions take offense to allowing gay couples to have some of the benefits of marriage, gays and lesbians will also have to assume new responsibilities as well.  When partners in a civil union decide they want to break up, they'll have to go to Family Court, just like when a married couple wants to divorce.  New couples will have to accept the joint debts of their partners, too.

The Constitution requires states to recognize the "acts, records and proceedings" of all other states.  Civil unions performed in Vermont should be recognized across the country, to protect both constitutional and human rights.


 
 
more info
 
the facts
It may be unconstitutional for other states not to recognize Vermont's civil unions

Many laws exist which prevent states from recognizing same-sex partnerships

the arguments
Vermont's mistake must not be allowed to spread beyond their borders


 
back to the issue



©1999 VOTE.COM. All rights reserved. Patent Pending. Book sales in association with Amazon.com. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Read our Privacy Policy and view our Security Statement.